The Gap Between
Desire and Virtue
A conversation with The Gap Foundations'sBobbie
Silten
Written by Peter
Laufer
I meet
Bobbi Silten, the Chief Foundation Officer of
Gap Foundation, in the company's impressive corporate headquarters on
San
Francisco's Embarcadero. In the
sprawling executive conference room, a wall of windows shows off a sweeping view
of the Bay
Bridge and boats on the bay. A
gorgeous San Francisco day, complete
with blue skies, emerald water and sweeping
mountains, serves as the backdrop for our conversation. In these opulent offices
Silten looks relaxed in a denim jacket. She accents her responses to my
questions with sparkling eyes and a wide smile. Her casual manner contrasts with
the intensity she brings to her observations on life and death issues. Her
answers are infused with passion.
Silten joined Gap in late in 2005, moving down
San
Francisco's waterfront from Levi
Strauss & Company, where she served as president of the Dockers brand and as
a member of board of the Levi Strauss
Foundation. Prior to her work at Levis Strauss, she spent almost a dozen years
in advertising at Foote, Cone & Belding. Her degree in social science
comes from the
University of
California at
Berkeley.
Gap is a primary participant in (Product) Red, an innovative
operation founded by music superstar Bono and businessman, philanthropist and
Santa
Monica city council
memberBobby Shriver. As participants in
the (Product) Red campaign, companies such as Gap,
American Express, Motorola, and Armani create a
new product line specific to the Red project. Portions of the profits from the
various Red lines go to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
The Global Fund was created after United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan
proposed the idea of an organization that would solicit and disburse
government and private funds which would be
used specifically to prevent and treat disease. Gap has signed on for a minimum
five-year commitment to the (Product) Red
campaign.
Peter
Laufer: I'm intrigued that you
come to the Gap Foundation from marketing, but
perhaps it's not that uncharacteristic given the changes in world of
philanthropy.
Bobbie
Silton: I actually started in business because I wanted to do
something that was socially good. My husband
defends people on death row. I remember one day
when I was working in advertising, I finally told him [dramatically], "I can't
do this anymore!" We think it was fate that I ended up in this job because I
understand business really well, so I understand how business can be leveraged
to impact the community in a positive way.
PL: You arrived at
Gap just as the hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and the
Gulf
Coast. Suddenly there was a huge need
even before you knew your way around corporate headquarters.
BS: Katrina happened the
week before I started. This probably was fate because the biggest natural
disaster in our country happened the week before I started this job, which then
all of a sudden brought to bear the importance of doing this kind of work.
PL: Were you able to
do something
immediately, involve the Gap Foundation in
Katrina relief efforts?
BS: Yes, my first week
on the job, that Friday, our CEO approved a
commitment to invite fifteen thousand kids from
the evacuee centers into our Old Navy stores for a shopping spree. Prior to that
decision, we quickly assessed the situation, and although we could have sent a
bunch of clothes, we realized the shelters couldn't handle the intake. They
didn't have a process for getting the right size to the right person. One of the
biggest things that particularly the kids were being impacted by was that their
daily routine had been taken away from them. One of the things that kids need is
that kind of daily structure. They also are kids, and they want to have fun.
Clothes are way that they express themselves. What we have are stores. Gap knows
how to make fun, we know how to give people a good
time. Instead of shipping a bunch of clothes,
we said, "Why don't we bring the kids to us?"
PL: That's terrific.
So you opened the Old Navy stores in the region to the affected kids and you let
them pick and choose what they wanted. The distribution system was already in
place.
BS: And that was a way
that we could leverage what we do well. We call it "leveraging our distinctive
company assets for the greater good," which is what has really influenced my
whole philosophy in this job. That's what I'm trying to do: figure out how we
leverage the might of a $16 billion company in an appropriate way for a
for-profit venture, but while doing things that are good for the community.
PL: Let
me play the cynic for a minute. How do you
answer the question, "Isn't that really just cheap advertising and promotion?"
Where is the balance between genuinely doing good and doing good to benefit the
company?
BS: We call it the
virtuous cycle. I believe that there's always going to be cynicism regarding the
motivations of a corporate, for-profit organization. I don't think it's a bad
thing if there's some benefit to the company,
because if we want to actually sustain
investment in the community, we have to look at
everybody's agenda. Whether it's the community agenda, the
consume r agenda, the employee agenda, the
stakeholder agenda, everybody has an agenda and the way you keep
something going is ensuring that everybody's
needs are met.
PL: So what's the
difference between "agenda" and "greed?" Are we a greed-based society that does
something good to assuage our consciences and
to make ourselves show well in public?
BS: No, I wouldn't say
that we're a greed-based society. People understand that when you invest in the
community there are benefits beyond the
immediate social issues you're trying to
address.
PL: Perhaps the more
a company helps out in the community, the more
customers it creates and the better the
company's bottom line. Can you make this direct equation: if the foundation
chose to abandon its work, would Gap not do as well?
BS: I'm not sure. I
haven't been here long enough to have those results yet. But what I can tell you
is that one of the key assets of the company are its employees. Keeping
employees loyal and engaged is important. One of the questions that's important
to employees, because they're a part of the community, is, "What are you doing
for the place I come from?" They want to feel
that the company they work for isn't just about profit. Research tells us that
employees are four times more likely to be
loyal if a company invests in the community.
PL: So you don't see
the recent surge of interest in philanthropy as a fad?
BS: I would like to
think of it as beyond being just hip, beyond what's in today and out tomorrow. I
think it's more of a consciousness. People are realizing, particularly after
9/11 and the war, that there's more to life than just stuff. They're looking for
the other things that fill them up. There's a phrase a researcher used, "the
armchair activist," because many people would love to do more, but either
they're time constrained or they don't have the
financial means to write big checks. What they
can do is buy something for themselves or for
someone else that also does
something for the greater good. They can feel
good about both the purchase and doing
something good for the community.
PL: And that's the
formula for your Red project.
BS: Red first of all is
a new business model, predicated on the notion of a healthy tension between
desire and virtue.
PL: At Gap you've
created a new line of clothing and fifty percent of the profits you earn from
the Red products go directly to the Global Fund to fight disease in
Africa. What's the formula?
BS: It's about creating
product that people want, but at the same
time, that product is doing
something good. We historically think about a
lot of for-benefit products as, "Well, it's for a good cause so, it may not look
as good or feel as good or taste as good, but I'll buy it because it's doing
something good." The proposition behind Red is
to create a product people really want, whether it's a Gap Red T-shirt or a Red
iPod. And it's doing good; that's what I think is so powerful about the idea.
PL: Throwing off
fifty percent of your profits from the Red line is quite a
statement. The Gap is offering about twenty Red
items currently. What percentage of your overall product line is that?
BS: Small. We don't have
the exact percentage because it's fluctuating.
PL: How did that
happen? What was the procedure? How did you and Gap get involved in the project?
BS: The Red folks
approached Gap and said here's this idea, we're looking for pioneer partners,
would you like to consider this? We didn't bring it into just the foundation.
One of the key things about Red is that if you're going to deliver both desire
and virtue you've got to do it across the whole company. It involves everyone
from people in design to people in corporate to people in the Foundation.
PL: So Gap
Foundation and the for-profit side were in it together?
BS: Yes, from the very
beginning. We believe the power of corporate philanthropy resides in the
business. We want to play more of a consultative role and address how we can
leverage the talent in the business to actually do good things for the
community.
PL: This sounds too
dreamy, doesn't it?
BS: I think you have to
dream. You have to create a vision of what you think could happen. It's not
going to be perfect. We're going to make mistakes. Ultimately I'd like to see
this type of work not being done in a
department or as an activity, but actually
being embedded in the business.
PL: You must get
approached daily by people who want to do
something such as Red did with you.
BS: We do.
PL: So how do you
differentiate? How do make the decisions and say, "Yes, this one's for us," or
even more difficult, "No, sorry, we can't help you."
BS: Red was thinking
about a new model in a compelling way, and it's a business model. They told us
that main purpose is to provide the Global Fund with a sustainable flow of
income, and they turned to the
commercial sector to do that. But in order for
it to be a sustainable flow of income, the
people who are providing the funding need to have a vested interest in the
success. The profit piece from Red is a small part of our business.
(Product)Red, as an idea, is a new model we wanted to explore, this whole
for-benefit concept. But it has other benefits as a lab for new ideas. Because
it's smaller [than the regular Gap product line] we can push the envelope on
some product ideas.
PL: Was the star
involvement a factor in your decision-making
process? It must be pretty seductive when Bono shows up on your doorstep and
asks you to come out and play.
BS: The model is so
compelling. When I saw the first presentation, I thought this is a fascinating
idea. Yes, it happens to be connected to a very compelling personality, but
it's the idea. We made a long-term
commitment to this program. We
weren't going make a
commitment if we felt the model was sketchy.
They really thought through the sustainability of it.
That's one of the biggest challenges in the
sector, trying to sustain sources of income for
social change.
PL: Is your job
sometimes
frustrating and depressing? You must get many really good ideas and spectacular
causes that you have to say "no" to. You certainly can't accommodate everything.
BS: Yes.
PL: How do you deal
with that when you go home?
BS: What I've had to do
is to realize, all right, we actually want to drive social change. If we just
try to do a little bit for every-body it's not going to really do any good. The
analogy that I like to use with my team is that I have a jar of peanut butter
and I can only make so many sandwiches. At some
point if you spread the peanut butter too thin, it ceases to be a peanut butter
sandwich. We have to make tough choices.
PL: You must also
get some dogs too. What kinds of things have
come into your office that are almost
laughable?
BS: I think that most of
what I see are good causes where there's a reason why people are motivated.
Either they've been personally affected or there is an obvious need out there. I
don't feel like my position is to judge whether or not
something is good or bad. I ask, "Does this
fall within what we are trying to do?"
PL: Do you feel the
Red template and Gap's five-year commitment is
an example to the sector?
BS: Yes-and it may not
be the exact replication of this-but this notion of creating product that people
actually want, that's just the first gate you have to get through. Start there.
Create something people want and have it do
something good, but have a model where you can
actually afford to keep doing it. I think that's
something that is a
movement for the future because there are so
many nonprofits today. They're going to have to start figuring out ways to
generate income rather than just asking people
to write checks and donate money. They are going to have to look for ways to
earn income, just as corporations do. As we
look at the business models that will play in the philanthropic sector, Red is
one of them.
That's why I think it is exciting to be bringing a new way of
thinking to philanthropy, and I'm sure there are many organizations out there
now trying to figure out how to do something
like this. I think it's very exciting that people are looking at the Red model
and saying, "What are some other things that
could be done?" Corporations grow and stretch themselves through competition.
Ideas get generated, innovation happens and innovation in the social sector is
really how we'll take philanthropy to the next level.
PL: Does part of the
motivation and part of the demand come from the
government's failure to provide adequately? We
saw that in the Katrina example.
BS: I think it's more
about infrastructure. There are more needs and more demand than can be
fulfilled. I do think that's where the corporate sector can step in and help,
whether it's with disaster relief or mediation
of health issues around the world. I think because we are a part of the
community, we also should play a role in helping.
PL: Are you having
fun while you're doing good?
BS: This job has
exceeded my expectations. I feel like I get to apply my business training, but
that I'm doing it for something that really
fills my soul. I feel very lucky.
PL: Now when you
talk about business with your husband you can say, "You're defending death row
inmates? That's nothing, I'm saving the world!"
BS: [Laughs] I do feel
like I am tapping into a different part of me,
and that I'm really being able to bring my personal passion together with my
business skills. One of the things I'm trying to do with our employees is match
professional skills with community needs. It's great for us to go out and do
these events where we give our people a rake or shovel or paintbrush. I believe
in those as great team-building efforts, but what I think is more powerful is
when you can actually take a marketing person or a finance person and put them
in a nonprofit and say "Use your professional skills because if they had to pay
for you it'd be a lot of money." That's one of the things we're trying to do
more: engage our talent at the professional level with organizations. And that's
not just senior executives, that's from associates in the store all the way up.
PL: Do you go out in
the field so you get to do some follow-up and
see the effects of your work? Have you gone over to
Africa and checked to see where this money is going?
BS: Yes. I was in
Rwanda. We went
to an AIDS clinic in
Rwanda where,
unfortunately, there are still three children to a bed, with the moms sitting
next to kids. That was hard to see, but the clinics were very sophisticated. We
were in a village up in the hills of
Rwanda and they
had just gotten electricity a few days before we arrived. Access to
medication is keeping people alive. I just got
back from India
where we're setting up a new program for women
who work in apparel factories, and we're providing them with opportunities to
get educated so that hopefully they'll have more choices in life.
PL: You must
come home from
that kind of trip ecstatic and crushed at the
same time.
BS: I feel that we are
very privileged, and part of our privilege is to do
something about these problems. That's what I
feel is my purpose now, to take all these skills that I've been given and
convert them into making a dent into what's going on in the world.